Windows Mobile Video Benchmark (Best Fit)

Deschid acest topic pentru a afla performanta video a device-urilor.

Sunteti invitati fiecare.
Pentru teste folositi CorePlayer 1.2.5 si acest clip video. E un trailer matrix reloaded la rezolutie VGA.

Folositi urmatoarele setari in CorePlayer (Menu > Tools > Preferences > Select Page > Video)
- Video output: DirectDraw
- Video quality: High
- Smooth Zoom: On
- Dither

La Zoom sa fie "Fit best" si nu "100%" (Menu > Options > Zoom > Fit Best)

Folosind "Fit best" pe deviceurile ce au o rezolutie diferita de VGA, se consuma mai multe resurse, rezultand un scor mai mic (procesorul trebuie si sa extinda/comprime imaginea)
Concret: pe SPV C600 la 264Mhz, folosind DirectDraw cu Best fit am scos 63.97% iar cu zoom la 100% am scos 83.60%!

Pentru teste DirectDraw la Zoom 100% vedeti topicul Windows Mobile Video Benchmark (Zoom 100%). Asa vom vedea CLAR diferentele.

Rulati video-ul, notati undeva si salvati screenshot-ul dupa care procedati tot asa dar folositi Raw Frame Buffer.

In cazul in care device-ul dvs dispune de un GPU dedicat, faceti un test folosindu-va si de acesta (la Video output alegeti GoForce, Qtv, XScale Imageon, sau ce e specific pt deviceul dvs)

Pentru screenshot instalati Resco PhotoViewer. O data cu acesta se instaleaza Screen Capture.

Postati de forma:

ROM: WM XX, autor

Device: XXX
CPU: XXX, XX Mhz
Video output: xxx
Rezolutie: xxx
Rezultat: % (util in cazul in care imaginea nu e disponbila din diverse motive)
Screenshot.
Extra: comentarii extra.


Rog fara ALTE discutii (gen "wow, ce scor"), pentru asta folosim topicul PPC & SP Benchmark (compararea performantelor WM). Vreau sa fie cat mai la obiect.

Asigurati-va ca nu aveti in background procese ce consuma CPU.

Sper ca se implica cat mai multi. Multumesc.

PS: Salvati imaginile in format PNG, ocupa mai putin!

Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:22

ROM: WM 6.0, Toshiba Official (5.2.1239 (build 17746.0.2.4))

Device: Toshiba G900
CPU: Marvell PXA270, 520 MHz
Video output: Direct Draw
Rezolutie: WVGA
Rezultat: 88.13%



Device: Toshiba G900
CPU: Marvell PXA270, 520 MHz
Video output: Raw FrameBuffer
Rezolutie: WVGA
Rezultat: 82,56%



Iar cu patchul care-mi modifica rezolutia in VGA am obtinut asta:

Rezolutie: VGA
Rezultat: 83.98%


Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:25

ROM: WM 6.1, ROMeOS 1.50.4

Device: HTC Touch Pro
CPU: Qualcomm MSM7201A, 528Mhz
Rezolutie: VGA


Video output: DirectDraw
Rezultat: 78.26%




Video output: QTv Display
Rezultat: 90.02%




Video output: Raw FrameBuffer
Rezultat: 80.35%



Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:39

ROM: WM 6.1, Samsung Oficial (ver DXHJ1)

Device: Samsung Omnia
CPU: Marvell ARM920T PXA312, 624Mhz
Rezolutie: WQVGA


Video output: DirectDraw
Rezultat: 134.21%




Video output: Intel XScale
Rezultat: 134.11%
Nota: Dupa cum vedeti, rezultatul este asemanator cu primul(DirectDraw)




Video output: Raw Frame Buffer
Rezultat: 134.54%



Nota: Accelerometrul era pornit in toate testele.

Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:34

Device: HTC Touch Cruise (Polaris)
ROM: WM 6.1 oficial
CPU: Qualcomm MSM7200, 400mhz
Rezolutie: QVGA

Video output: DirectDraw
Rezultat: 70.34%



Video output: Raw FrameBuffer
Rezultat: 68.59%



Video output: QTv Display
Rezultat: 68.65%




Video output: GDI
Rezultat: 65.72%



Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:28

device: HTC TyTN 2 (Kaiser)
CPU: Qualcomm MSM7200, 400mhz
Video output: DirectDraw
Rezolutie: QVGA
Rezultat: 68.23%



Edited by Mishulica at 05-12-2008, 19:13

(incomplet, lipseste: raw framebuffer)

ROM: eOS.4.888.FiRe WWE

Device: HTC TyTN 2 (Kaiser)
CPU: Qualcomm MSM7200, 400mhz
Rezolutie: QVGA


Video output: QTV
Rezultat: 81,96%




Video output: DirectDraw
Rezultat: 72,87%



Videooutput:Raw frame buffer
Rezultat:70,44%
#/file.php?id=262908

Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:53

(incomplet, lipseste: direct draw, raw frame buffer)

Device: HTC Touch HD (Blackstone)
CPU: QUALCOMM 7210A, 528mhz
Video output: QTV
Rezolutie: WVGA
Rezultat: 88.02%




Extra test

device: HTC Touch HD (Blackstone)
CPU: QUALCOMM 7210A

Video output qTv Dysplay
Video quality High
Smooth On
Dither
Rezolutie WVGA
Rezultat: 123.23%

Video testat

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ymynymdzcm4

Proprietati trailer

Format : Flash Video
File size : 10.0 MiB
PlayTime : 1mn 29s
Bit rate : 943 Kbps
StreamSize/String : 2.76 KiB
Encoded date : 2I w\11
Tagged date : UTC 2008-11-16 19:40:59
tagging application : created with SUPER(C).v2008.bld.33
Meta_Tag : Seven Pounds Trailer

Video #0
Codec : Sorenson H263
PlayTime : 1mn 29s
Width : 560 pixels
Height : 304 pixels
Display Aspect ratio : 16/9
Frame rate : 24.000 fps
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.000
StreamSize/String : 8.78 MiB

Audio #0
Codec : MPEG-1 Audio layer 3
Codec profile : Joint stereo
PlayTime : 1mn 29s
Bit rate mode : CBR
Bit rate : 112 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz
Resolution : 16 bits
StreamSize/String : 1.24 MiB
Writing library : LAME3.97




Edited by Mishulica at 05-12-2008, 19:15

Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:53

ROM: WM 6.1 Standard, cooked (nu mai stiu cine-i autorul)

Device: HTC Tornado (SPV C600)
CPU: TI OMAP 850, 264Mhz (overclockat)
Rezolutie: QVGA


Video output: DirectDraw
Rezultat: 63.97%




Video output: Raw Frame Buffer
Rezultat: 62.39%




Device: HTC Tornado (SPV C600)
CPU: TI OMAP 850, 180Mhz
Video output: DirectDraw
Rezolutie: QVGA
Rezultat: 42.06%




@omu_salcam si niste screnshoturi daca se poate (dai un edit)?
@dotexe pui si un test facut in DirectDraw & Raw Frame Buffer?
@chester si tu unul in Xscale & Raw Frame Buffer?
De fapt pe toti v-as ruga sa adaugati si Raw Frame Buffer

Multumesc.

PS: Salvati imaginile in format PNG, ocupa mai putin!

Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:45

(incomplet, lipseste: raw framebuffer)

ROM: WM 5.0, Orange Official

Device: SPV C100/HTC S310
CPU: TI OMAP 850, 200Mhz
Video output: DirectDraw
Rezolutie: QQVGA
Rezultat: 50.02%



Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:52

ROM : Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional
Device : HTC Wizard
CPU :TI Omap 850 -> 312 mhz (overclock)
Rezolutie : QVGA


Video output : DirectDraw
Rezultat :72,26%




Video output : Raw FrameBuffer
Rezultat : 74,34%




Video output : GDI
Rezultat : 68,34%



Edited by Mishulica at 05-12-2008, 21:48

Edited by Mishulica at 05-12-2008, 21:48

ROM: WM 5, cooked

Device: HTC Himalaya
CPU: Intel XScale PXA263, 400 MHz
Rezolutie: QVGA


Video output: DirectDraw
Rezultat: 75.61%




Video output: Raw FrameBuffer
Rezultat: 73.58%




Video output: ATI Imageon
Rezultat: 72.18%

ROM: Windows Mobile 6.0 Professional CE OS 5.2.163 (Build 18129.0.4.5)

Device: Gigabyte g-Smart MW700
CPU: Marvell PXA270, 520MHz
Rezolutie: QVGA

Video output: DirectDraw
Rezultat: 112.11%




Video output: Raw FrameBuffer
Rezultat: 116.50%




Video output: Intel XScale
Rezultat: 115.63%



Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:50

(incomplet, lipseste: ati imageon, raw framebuffer)

Rom: Schapp's 4.31
PPC: Htc TyTN ( Hermes/ Spv m3100)
CPU: Samsung - 400 mhz
Display res: QVGA
Video output: DirectDraw




si nu vreau sa fiu offtopic... dar vreau sa evidentiez avantajul de a avea accelerator grafic. Cu Ati IMAGEON activat in loc de DirectDraw obtin la cu acelasi filmulet rezultate intre 105-120% !

edit: rectificat. Acum am facut bench la intregul clip. Viteza mai buna

Edited by Mishulica at 06-12-2008, 18:51

ROM: WM 6.1, T.I.R. V8R

Device: HTC Touch Pro
CPU: Qualcomm MSM7201A, 528Mhz
Rezolutie: VGA


Video output: DirectDraw
Rezultat: 77.99%




Video output: Qtv Display
Rezultat: 87.34%




Video output: Raw Frame Buffer
Rezultat: 80%




Extra: folosesc driverele ATI Direct3D de la HTC DIamond, anyway, in acest caz nu ajuta cu nimic.